Cases 91 - 100 of 1,112
Brian Mann v. Cindy Griffith
as 21-2552
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Mann
Respondent / Appellee:
Cindy Griffith
Daniel Williams v. Hilton Hall, Jr., et al
as 21-5540
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER S. JONES, CORECIVIC, SERGEANT MANN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LYNN WILLIAMS
Mann Construction, Inc., et al v. USA
as 21-1500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANN CONSTRUCTION, INC., LEE COUGHLIN, KIMBERLY WOOD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Byron Phillips v. The Life Property Management, et al
as 21-11350
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL HAVRE, CEO, Northwest Registered Agent, LLC, CURTIS MCMURRAY, CEO, JAMES W. CONROY, Dekalb County Police Chief (Individual Capacity) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON WENDELL PHILLIPS
Mark Mann v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 21-11445
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, E. PEREZ PEREZ, CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC, A Florida limited liability company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MANN
Sasson v. Howard Mann
as 21-922
Plaintiff:
Arnold Garelick and Uri Sasson
Counter Claimant:
Howard Mann, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Philip Mann
Robert Mann, Sr., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 21-15440
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MANN and ZACHARY MANN
Defendant:
SAMUEL D. SOMERS, Jr., CITY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDY R. LOZOYA and JOHN C. TENNIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEBORAH MANN, VERN MURPHY-MANN and ROBERT MANN, Sr.
United States v. Mann
as 21-1129
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER B. MANN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
