Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 351
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2021mc24242
Plaintiff: Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Data Services, Inc.
Defendant: WDC Holdings LLC doing business as Northstar Commercial Partners, Brian Watson, Sterling NCP FF, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
IPA Technologies Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 22-1193
Plaintiff / Appellant: IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defendant / Appellee: AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, LLC
GateGuard, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv09321
Plaintiff: GateGuard, Inc.
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc., Amazon.com Services, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
M2M Solutions LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 22-1122
Appellant: M2M SOLUTIONS LLC
Appellee: AMAZON.COM, INC.
M2M Solutions LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 22-1124
Appellant: M2M SOLUTIONS LLC
Appellee: AMAZON.COM, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08715
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Caston v. Jeff Bezos, et al
as 21-35910
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES CASTON
Defendant / Appellee: JEFF BEZOS, CEO, Amazon and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Harry Williby v. USDC-CASF
as 21-71353
Not Classified By Court: In re: HARRY J. WILLIBY, SERGEY BRIN, LARRY PAGE and others
Petitioner: HARRY J. WILLIBY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 21-2624
Plaintiff / Appellant: Dean Nicosia, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Amazon.com, Inc.
Brenda Johnson v. USA, et al
as 21-35761
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?