Cases 101 - 110 of 1,825
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-36027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, GEORGE WALLACE, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-36026
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, GEORGE WALLACE, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-36025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, GEORGE WALLACE, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv03724
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, CLEAN POWER LAKE COUNTY, RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Sierra Club v. EPA
as 22-60650
Petitioner:
Sierra Club, Downwinders at Risk and Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Defense Fund et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 3:2022cv07731
Plaintiff:
Environmental Defense Fund and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Defense Fund et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 3:2022mc80331
Plaintiff:
Environmental Defense Fund and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Western Energy Alliance et al v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance and Petroleum Association of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Center for Biological Diversity, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
California Communities Against Toxics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1303
Petitioner:
California Communities Against Toxics, Coalition for a Safe Environment, Sierra Club and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Food & Water Watch v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 22-6543
Petitioner:
FOOD & WATER WATCH, RECIRCULATING FARMS COALITION, CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
