Cases 121 - 130 of 703
In re: SCANA Corporation
as 20-1954
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SCANA CORPORATION PUBLIC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
Appellant:
SCANA CORPORATION
Defendant:
SHARON A. DECKER, LYNNE M. MILLER, GREGORY E. ALIFF and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
METZLER ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Cadlerock Joint Venture II, LP v. Cecil Fielder et al
as 8:2020mc00082
Defendant:
C.J. USA, Inc., Betz Trucking, Inc. and Cecil Fielder
Plaintiff:
Cadlerock Joint Venture II, LP
Dewayne Naumann, et al v. NewRez, L.L.C.
as 20-50737
Defendant / Appellee:
NewRez, L.L.C., doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dewayne Dean Naumann and Theresa Cecile Gloier
Cecil NelsonIn re: Cecil Nelson
as 20-13178
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: CECIL DEWITT NELSON
Cecil Truman v. Frye
as 20-7219
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FARLEY, Correctional Officer, MR. MCDOUGAL, Correctional Officer and MR. FRYE, Sergeant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL GUY TRUMAN
Linda Frew, et al v. Cecile Young, et al
as 20-40541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carla Frew, Mary Jane Garza, Maria Ayala, as next friend of her minor children, Christopher Arizola, Leonard Jimenez, and Joseph Veliz and others
Defendant / Appellee:
M.D. Cecile Young, M.D. Kyle Janek, M.D. John William Hellerstedt, M.D. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Cecil Hatchett v. Ken Clark
as 20-72188
Respondent:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Petitioner:
CECIL JEROME HATCHETT
Cecile Brown v. USA
as 20-35651
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Board of Veteran Appeals
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECILE ANDREA BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
