Cases 11 - 20 of 29
USA v. Alfredo Ramirez, et al
as 14-10088
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALFREDO CESAR RAMIREZ, AKA Alfredo C. Cesar-Ramirez, AKA Alfredo Cesar Cesar-Ramirez, AKA Alfredo Rodriguez-Ramirez
Rodriguez-Benejam et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as PR/3:14-cv-01006
Plaintiff:
Enrique Rodriguez-Benejam , Ana M. Rodriguez-Nogues , Enrique Rodriguez-Nogues and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
United States of America v. Terry
as 13-3759
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alfredo Rodriguez and Maurice Baptiste
Defendant - Appellant:
Johnny Terry, AKA Blaze
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ramos et al
as 5:2013cv02001
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ignacia Renteria Ramos and Alfredo Rodriguez Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Communications Act of 1994
USA v. Jose Rodriguez-Soto
as 13-10241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ-SOTO
Alfredo Rodriguez Valdiva, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72839
Petitioner:
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ VALDIVA and MARIA GLORIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alfredo Rodriguez Valdiva, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72925
Petitioner:
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ VALDIVA, MARIA GLORIA RODRIGUEZ and ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ RUVALCABA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Alfredo Rodriguez Valdivia, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72934
Petitioner:
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ VALDIVIA and MARIA GLORIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Rodriguez Arrellano
as 4:2010mj00022
Defendant:
Jose Alfredo Rodriguez Arrellano
Plaintiff:
USA
Jose Alfredo Rodriguez Arrellano
as 4:2010mj00022
Defendant:
Jose Alfredo Rodriguez Arrellano
Plaintiff:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
