Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Defeo v. Koster et al
as 6:2015cv03076
Defendant: Chris Koster, Dan Patterson and Ronald K. Replogle
Plaintiff: Roy Defeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of Missouri, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-17111
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA EGG FARMERS
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF UTAH, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
State of Missouri, ex rel., Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri v. Harris
as 1:2014at00067
Plaintiff: State of Missouri and Chris Koster
Defendant: Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Missouri et al v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04044
Plaintiff: State of Missouri , Chris Koster and The Commissioner of Securities
Defendant: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
In re: Standard & Poor's Rating Agency Litigation
as 1:2013md02446
Plaintiff: State of Maine , Dustin McDaniel , Arizona, State of and others
Defendant: MCGraw-Hill Companies Inc , Standard and Poor's Financial Services LLC , Moody's Corporation and others
Amicu: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Plastino, et al v. Chris Koster, et al
as 13-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. and Edward F. Plastino
Defendant / Appellee: Chris Koster, in his official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Missouri and Tom Neer, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of St. Charles County, Missouri
State of Missouri et al v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00221
Plaintiff: State of Missouri , Chris Koster and The Commissioner of Securities
Defendant: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Richard Anderson v. Chris Koster
as 11-3577
Petitioner: Richard G. Anderson
Respondent: Chris Koster
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department and others
Jane Doe I, et al v. Jeremiah J. Nixon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellee: Jane Doe, I, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, I and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri, Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, James Corwin, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department and others
Defendant: Thomas O'Connor, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Maryland Heights, Missouri, Police Department, Robert P. McCulloch, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, Steven Kruse, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Bowling Green, Missouri, Police Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?