Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Carlton Ray Smith
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau and City of Portland, OR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nicita et al v. City of Oregon City
as 3:2022cv00738
Petitioner:
James J Nicita, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Patricia Spady
Respondent:
City of Oregon City
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Wicks et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Portland, Portland Police Dept. and Det. Mathew Brown
Hale v. City of Atlanta et al
as 3:2021cv01318
Plaintiff:
Brian Hale
Defendant:
City of Atlanta and State of GA
Hale v. City of Boston et al
as 3:2021cv01317
Plaintiff:
Brian Hale
Defendant:
City of Boston and State of Massachusetts
Hale v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 3:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Brian Hale
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and State of California
Hale v. New York City et al
as 3:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
Brian Hale
Defendant:
New York City and New York State
Campbell v. US Veterans Department et al
as 3:2021cv01002
Plaintiff:
Dave Campbell
Defendant:
US Veterans Department and City of Portland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
