Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Alphonso Frazier, II v. The City of Omaha Police Dept., et al
as 19-2069
Defendant / Appellee: Peter C. Jessen, Dentist, Individual and Official Capacity, Andrea McChesney, Attorney, Individual and Official Capacity, Donald Kleine, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alphonso Vernell Frazier, II
Shane Harrington, et al v. Susan Strong, et al
as 19-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant: H & S Club Omaha, Inc., Shane Harrington, Meltech, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Aimee Melton, Michelle Bang, John and Jane Doe, Nebraska State Patrol Officers #1-#800, In Their Individual Capacities and Official Capacities as Employees of the State of Nebraska and others
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor: CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner: CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner: COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor: CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Pete Ricketts, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant: Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee: Pete Ricketts, In his Capacity as Governor of the State of Nebraska, Doug Peterson, In his Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and Todd Schmaderer, In his Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Omaha
Defendant: Gary Troutman, in his capacity as City Administrator of Bellevue, Nebraska, Leonard Houloose, in his capacity as Chief of the Papillion Police Department, L. Kenneth Polikov, in his capacity as Sarpy County Attorney and others
City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System et al v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv10116
Plaintiff: City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and Thomas E. Kalaway
Defendant: Bank of Nova Scotia New York Agency, BMO Capital Markets Corp , BNP Paribas Securities Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In re: Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015md02673
Plaintiff: Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Robert L. Teel and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: American Federation of Teachers, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, Rogers Varner, Jr. and others
Defendant: TD Securities (USA) LLC, Jeffries LLC, Barclays Bank, PLC and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Bank of America Corp. and John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System et al v. Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency et al
as 1:2015cv08890
Plaintiff: City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and Thomas E. Kalaway
Defendant: Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency, BMO Capital Markets Corp., BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Randall Krause v. City of Omaha We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2985
Plaintiff - Appellant: Randall S. Krause
Defendant - Appellee: City of Omaha
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Insulet Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv12345
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Defendant: Insulet Corporation , Duane DeSisto , Patrick J. Sullivan and others
Movant: Jefferey Smith , City of Bristol Pension Fund , City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?