Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Carl Smith v. United States
as 19-2873
Petitioner: Carl Eugene Smith, also known as CJ
Respondent: United States of America
USA v. Eugene Smith, III
as 19-1530
Defendant / Appellant: EUGENE SMITH, III
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Eugene Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2063
Defendant / Appellant: EUGENE SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Tyrius Smith
as 19-4066
Defendant / Appellant: TYRIUS EUGENE SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jody Smith v. United State
as 16-3048
Petitioner: Jody Eugene Smith
Respondent: United States of America
US v. Leon Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4084
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: LEON EUGENE SMITH
Gloria Smith, et al v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generat, et al
as 15-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLORIA MAE SMITH, as personal representative of the estate of EUGENE SMITH and GLORIA MAE SMITH, in her own right and PATRICIA ALDENE WEST
Defendant - Appellee: BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP INC, as Successor-in-interest to Babacock & Wilcox Company, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO, predecessors-in-interest, successors-in-interest, subdivisions and subsidiaries and BABCOCK & WILCOX TECHNICAL SERVICES GROUP INC
Defendant: B&W TECHNICAL SERVICES INC, FKA B&W Nuclear Environmental Services Inc
In re: Steven Smith
as 15-15293
Petitioner: In re: STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Eugene Smith
as 15-13718
Petitioner: In re: EUGENE SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Jody Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2912
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Jody Eugene Smith

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?