Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. USDC-CASJ
as 18-71335
:
In re: LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Ph. D.
Petitioner:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Ph. D.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
APPLE, INC., Assigns and Agents, and App Store Web Appilication Providers, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Assigns and Agents, and Samsung's Google Play Web Appilication Providers, FACEBOOK, INC., Assigns and Agents and others
Arunachalam v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01250
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam, Ph.D.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. , Samsung Electronics America, Inc. , Facebook, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
John Tabar v. Fiserv, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08304
Defendant:
Does and Fiserv, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Tabar
Ajamian v. Zakurian
as 16-2887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant - Appellee:
Samuel Egish Zakurian, Amy Van Dam, Michael Maillet and others
Jason Alan v. Fiserv, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv05479
Plaintiff:
Jason Alan
Defendant:
Does and Fiserv, Inc.
Ajamian v. Zakurian et al
as 2:2015cv07442
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant:
Amy Van Dam, Fiserv Securities, Inc., Michael Maillet and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Fiserv Solutions LLC v. Financial Institution Plaintiffs
as 2:2015mc00040
Plaintiff:
Fiserv Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Financial Institution Plaintiffs
USA v. Neftali Oquendo
as 14-14462
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NEFTALI ESAU BILLY OQUENDO
Interested Party:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, BANK OF MONTREAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00371
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Maxim Integrated Products Inc
as 2:2013mc00042
Movant:
Maxim Integrated Products Inc
Respondent:
FiServ Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
