Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Rollo et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as CAN/3:18-cv-02577
Plaintiff:
Richard Rollo , Craig Crenshaw , Patrick Gaskill and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , McKesson Corporation , Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Von Zamft v. DeSantis, Gaskill, Smith & Shenkman, P.A. et al
as 9:2013cv80985
Plaintiff:
Ethan F Von Zamft
Defendant:
DeSantis, Gaskill, Smith & Shenkman, P.A. , Timothy W Gaskill and Loxahatchee River Environmental Control District,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alleman et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02003
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Manieri , Ricardo Martinez , Leon McElveen and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Wiand v. Gaskill
as 8:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Burton W. Wiand and Burton W. Wiand
Defendant:
Albert R. Gaskill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
US v. Jerry Gaskill
as 09-4562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY GASKILL
Gaskill v. Nationwide Credit Inc
as 1:2009cv03152
Plaintiff:
Duane Gaskill and Duane Gaskill
Defendant:
Nationwide Credit Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carl T. Gaskill v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73497
Defendant:
A-bex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Gaskill
Robert Bryan Gaskill v. 3m, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-74592
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryan Gaskill
Defendant:
3m
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NC Department of Transportation, et al
as 5:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Jerry Gaskill, Billy R. Moore and North Carolina Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
