Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2021cv20174
Plaintiff:
MODERN ORTHOPAEDICS OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Venusti v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield
as 21-2183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES VENUSTI
Defendant / Appellee:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
LifeWatch Services Inc v. Highmark Inc, et al
as 21-1142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIFEWATCH SERVICES INC
Defendant / Appellee:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION and others
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv18140
Defendant:
ENGLEWOOD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC., WellCare Health Plans, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY, Mount Sinai Health System, Inc., CARE PLUS BERGEN, INC. doing business as BERGEN NEW BRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL K. FUREY, ST. MARY'S PASSAIC LLC'S, BRIGHTON HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
WOLK v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2020cv13805
Plaintiff:
NANCY P WOLK
Defendant:
HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY and HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. doing business as HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross Cooperman MD LLC v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, et al
as 20-2899
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSS COOPERMAN MD LLC, on behalf of patient LPH
Defendant / Appellee:
FIDELIS CO LLC, HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY and BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
