Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Newman v. Spark Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Vin Milano, Jeffrey D. Marazzo, Katherine High, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Newman
Kent v. Spark Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Steven M. Altschuler, Robert J. Perez, Elliott Sigal and others
Wang v. Spark Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00479
Defendant:
Steven M. Altschuler, Elliott Sigal, Jeffrey D. Marazzo and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Piedra v. Reyes et al
as 1:2018cv21355
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Piedra
Defendant:
Tanayra Reyes, David Young and Juan J. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mr. Juan Perez v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2018cv00267
Respondent:
County of Los Angeles, Mr. Sullivan and Superior Court of California
Petitioner:
Mr. Juan J. Perez
USA v. Eric Perez
as 18-30004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC J. PEREZ, AKA Ignacio Valdez
Gundin v. TerraForm Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03113
Defendant:
TerraForm Power, Inc., Terraform Global, Inc., Ahmad Chatila and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Perez Gundin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 5851
Gundin v. TerraForm Global, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00516
Defendant:
TerraForm Power, Inc., TerraForm Global, Inc., Ahmad Chatila and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Perez Gundin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 5851
USA v. Agusto Lazo-Aguirre
as 16-20467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AGUSTO LAZO-AGUIRRE, also known as Natividad Aparic Aguirre, also known as Agusto Lazo Aguire, also known as Juan J. Perez, also known as Natividad A. Aguirre, also known as Natividad A. Aparicio, also known as Jose O. Pineda, also known as Aguirre Nativi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
