Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Jorge Mendoza v. USA
as 20-11230
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE MARTIN MARTINEZ MENDOZA
Martinez v. Spaulding
as 20-1023
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE FERNANDEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHEN SPAULDING, Warden and STEPHEN SPAULDING, Warden, FMC Devens
Bondit LLC v. Hallows Movie Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09832
Defendant:
Crossface LLC, Hallows Movie Inc., Dongkwan "Tony" Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Bondit LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Antonio Tapia Salazar v. William Barr
as 19-72900
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TAPIA SALAZAR, AKA Jorge Lopez Martinez, AKA Antonio Jose Tapia, AKA Jose Antonio Tapia Gutierrez
Jorge Mendoza v. USA
as 19-12450
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE MARTIN MARTINEZ MENDOZA
Jorge Martinez v. USA
as 19-3497
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE A. MARTINEZ
Jorge Martinez-Munatones v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60354
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS MARTINEZ-MUNATONES
Jorge Martinez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20302
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE ENRIQUE MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. George Aguilar-Martinez
as 19-50211
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE AGUILAR-MARTINEZ, also known as Jorge Martinez-Aguilar, also known as Jorge A. Martinez, also known as Goerge Martinez, also known as George Aguilar, also known as Jorge Arturo Martinez-Aguilar, also known as George Martinez-Aguilar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jorge Martinez v. William Barr
as 19-3040
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO MARTINEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
