Cases 11 - 20 of 129
United States v. Nathan Smith
as 23-1216
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nathan James Smith
US v. Stacy Smith
as 23-4037
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STACY JAMES SMITH
James Smith v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al
as 22-8017
Respondent:
James Smith, Individually, and purportedly on behalf of All Others and American Detective Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
In re: Kenneth Shannon
as 22-1805
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH KENNEDY SHANNON, a/k/a James Smith, a/k/a Kevin Sanders
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Wilbert SmithIn re: Wilbert Smith
as 22-1585
Petitioner:
In re: WILBERT JAMES SMITH
Respondent:
MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022mi00039
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
USA v. Wilbert Smith, Jr.
as 22-1055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILBERT JAMES SMITH, JR.
Mitchel Albin v. Dr. David W. Suetholz, et al
as 21-6044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHEL ALBIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JEFFREY TILLINGHAST, CORRECTIONS OFFICER FELICIANO VELASCO, CORRECTIONS OFFICER PATRICK RYDER and others
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER ANDREW HAMILTON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER CHARLES SCHADLER, DAVID W. SUETHOLZ and others
Larry Jones v. Zachary Jenkins, et al
as 21-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ZACHARY JENKINS, Regional Manager of Security, in his individual capacity, ROBERT JAMES SAENA, Assistant General Manager, in his individual capacity, DANIEL RALPH HERRERA, Employee of Menards, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
