Cases 11 - 20 of 225
Marshall Lloyd, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-1245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FORD MOTOR COMPANY F-150 AND RANGER TRUCK FUEL ECONOMY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL B. LLOYD, DUSTIN DAWSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RICK SHAWLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Sean Houston, et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN HOUSTON
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE KRISTINI DAVENPORT TRUST
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, US Department of Justice, JANET YELLEN, US Department of Treasury, DEBORAH HAALAND, US Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
US v. James Sanderson
as 23-6515
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM PAUL SANDERSON
James Williams, IVIn re: James Williams, IV
as 23-3236
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WILLIAMS, IV
Respondent:
SUMMIT BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTER
Williams v. Macy's Inc.
as 3:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Larry Williams
as 23-6201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY JAMES WILLIAMS
James Williams, IVIn re: James Williams, IV
as 23-3118
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WILLIAMS, IV
Respondent:
GREENE COUNTY, OH ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Williams v. Hallmark Cards, Inc
as 3:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Hallmark Cards, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Charles Williams
as 22-30145
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
