Cases 11 - 20 of 262
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shomo v. State of New York
as 24-818
Plaintiff:
JOSE SHOMO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, STEWART ECKERT, Superintendent, individually and in official capacity and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Doe 1, et al. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Doe 1 et al v. Palpung Thubten Choling
as 7:2023cv10117
Defendant:
Palpung Thubten Choling and Kagyu Thubten Choling
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TYSON v. COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv22066
Plaintiff:
Sydney Tyson
Defendant:
COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
