Other Statutes Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 34
American International Group, Inc. v. Pacific Investment Management Company LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03339
Plaintiff: American International Group, Inc.
Defendant: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC , Pimco California Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund , Pimco California Short Duration Municipal Income Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Blackrock Balanced Capital Portfolio (FI) et al v. HSBC Bank USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv09366
Plaintiff: PIMCO FUNDS: PIMCO MODERATE DURATION FUND, BLACKROCK INCOME TRUST, INC., PCM Fund, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. F/K/A WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv05875
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Neco Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05831
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Neco Alliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, ABC Appliance, Inc. and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2013cv05568
Plaintiff: Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Kennedy v. England et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00988
Defendant: Argentina, Armenia, Australia and others
Plaintiff: Joseph F. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bitton v. Chitrid et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv05359
Plaintiff: Danielle Bitton, Marcelle Bitton, Marcelle Fhima and others
Defendant: Simon Chitrid, President Obama, Mayor of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03419
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Laydon
Defendant: Mizuho Bank, Ltd., The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012mc02296
Plaintiff: NOTE HOLDERS: Wilmington Trust Company, Marc S. Kirschner, RETIREES: William A. Niese and others
Defendant: CURRENT & FORMER DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS: Harry Amsden: Stephen D. Carver: Dennis J. FitzSimons: Robert Gremillion: Donald C. Grenesko: David Dean Hiller: Timothy J. Landon: Thomas D. Leach: Luis E. Le, LARGE SHAREHOLDERS: McCormick and Cantigny Foundations, New Life International Trust and others
Interested Party: General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Trust, Exhibit A Shareholder Defendants' Executive Committee and THE EFFIE AND WOFFORD CAIN FOUNDATION
Not Classified By Court: Valuation Research Corporation
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Geraldo Rivera, Ervin L Heyde, Jr and Defendants listed on Schedule A
Consolidated Defendant: New Life International
Intervenor Plaintiff: TENDERING PHONES HOLDERS: Citadel Equity Fund Ltd., Camden Asset Management LP and Certain of their Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?