Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Jose Morales v. USDC-CAOAK
as 17-71316
:
In re: JOSE LUIS MORALES
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES, AKA Joseluis Morales
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
P. E. TINGEY, A. WILLIAMS, J. D. HOLLINGER and others
USA v. Jose Morale
as 17-40114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES, also known as El Patron
USA v. Jose Morales
as 16-16507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
United States v. Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez
as 14-3135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felipe Jesus Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as El Pipo, also known as Luis Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Morales, also known as Jorge Salas-Gonzales
United States v. Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez
as 14-3135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Felipe Jesus Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as El Pipo, also known as Luis Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Morales, also known as Jorge Salas-Gonzales
Jose Morales v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-70615
:
In re: JOSE LUIS MORALES
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
J. WOLF, SUE RISENHOOVER, GREGORY DUNCAN, Dr. and others
US v. Jose Morales-Espino
as 13-4943
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES-ESPINO, a/k/a Luisito
Jose Morales v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-71728
:
In re: JOSE LUIS MORALES
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
P. E. TINGEY, A. WILLIAMS, J. D. HOLLINGER and others
Jose Morales v. Martin Biter
as 12-74211
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent:
MARTIN BITER, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
