Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jose Salazar-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71740
Petitioner:
JOSE SALAZAR-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jose Salazar-Luna
as 13-10626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO SALAZAR-LUNA, AKA Jose Salazar
United States of America v. Prado (Vidal Espinal)
as 13-2894
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Giovanni Prado, AKA Joker, Erick Alvarado, AKA "Gato Seco", Elenilson Ortiz, AKA "Shorty" and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Vidal Espinal, AKA Demente
USA v. Jesus Sanchez
as 13-30098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS GUADALUPE SANCHEZ, AKA Che, AKA Jose Salazar
Jose Salazar Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71254
Petitioner:
JOSE DE JESUS SALAZAR GOMEZ, AKA Ladron, AKA Jose Salazar
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jose Salazar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70270
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO SALAZAR, AKA Jose Antonio Saiazar, AKA Jose Salazar, AKA Jose A. Salazar
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jose Rocha
as 11-51081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO SALAZAR ROCHA, also known as Jose Salazar-Rocha, also known as Antonio Gaytan
US v. Jose Mercado
as 11-4530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SALAZAR MERCADO
Roberto Corea-Salazar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73895
Petitioner:
ROBERTO JOSE COREA-SALAZAR, AKA Roberto Corea-Gomez, AKA Roberto Gomez, AKA Roberto C. Gomez, AKA Roberto Jose Salazar Gomez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jose Salazar-Martinez
as 10-20408
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SALAZAR-MARTINEZ, also known as Jose Salazar, also known as Jose Daniel Salazar, also known as Jose Daniel Salazar Martinez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
