Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Donald Dailey, Jr. v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.
as 10-1154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD F. DAILEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER, INC.
Third Party - Appellee:
ELIZABETH M. WOLF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C. v. North American Peruvian Horse Association et al
as 2:2009cv04511
Plaintiff:
Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C., Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C. and Figuerola Peruvians, L.L.C.
Defendant:
North American Peruvian Horse Association, Barbara Windom, Donna J. Bearer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Lan-Anh Truong
as 09-55613
Debtor:
In the Matter of: LAN-ANH TRUONG
Appellant:
LAN-ANH TRUONG and PHAN-ANH DO
Appellee:
JOHN M. WOLFE, the Chapter 7 Trustee of the Debtor
In re: Dusko Cavic, et al v. John Wolfe, et al
as 09-60016
Debtor:
In re: DUSKO CAVIC and LJILJANA CAVIC
Appellant:
DUSKO CAVIC
Appellee:
JOHN M. WOLFE, Chapter 7 Trustee, VESTIN MORTGAGE, INC., UNITED STATES TRUSTEE and others
Wolfe et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2008mc00117
Petitioner:
Peter V. Wolfe and Carol M. Wolfe
Respondent:
Lisa Garcia, - Department of the Treasury/Internal Revenue Service of the United States, Donald L. Korb and others
Cintas Corporation v. Blackman et al
as 3:2006cv05100
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Matthew L. Blackman, Vince McClain Burghart, Michael Cumley and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE FILEPP
as 03-1198
Appellant:
ALEXANDER BIDWELL, ALLAN M. WOLF, DUANE TIEMANN and others
Appellee:
JAMES E. ROGAN, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
