Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Wiggins v. Asbestos Defendants (B P) et al
as 4:2007cv01322
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants (B P), The Boeing Company, Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. Agere Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
Agere, Inc., Alcolac, Inc., Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
VENTURE INDUSTRIES V AUTOLIV ASP
as 07-1118
Defendant-Appellant:
Autoliv ASP, Inc. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Larry J. Winget, Patent Holding Company, Vemco, Incorporated and others
VENTURE INDUSTRIES V AUTOLIV ASP
as 05-1537
Defendant-Appellant:
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
Defendant:
AUTOLIV, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff-Appellee:
LARRY J. WINGET, PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, VEMCO, INCORPORATED and others
VENTURE INDUSTRIES V AUTOLIV ASP
as 04-1488
Defendant-Appellant:
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
VENTURE INDUSTRIES V AUTOLIV ASP
as 04-1486
Defendant-Appellant:
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
Defendant:
AUTOLIV, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
LARRY J. WINGET, PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, VEMCO, INCORPORATED and others
AUTOLIV ASP V PATENT HOLDING CO
as 01-1159
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.) and AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee:
PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, PATENT HOLDING COMPANY and PATENT HOLDING COMPANY
USA v. Wauconda Sand, et al
as 1:1993cv07637
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Wauconda Sand & Gravel Company , John Obenauf, Jensen Disposal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
