Cases 11 - 20 of 740
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Maureen Wirtz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Spina v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO FRANCOIS SPINA, II, also named as Antonio Spina and Antonio Francois Spina
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, WALTER HENSLEY, UNKNOWN STICKLEY and others
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
CUMMINGS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02003
Petitioner:
MAUREEN CUMMINGS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Levy et al v. McNamee et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
Elias Levy and Camerohn X. Withers
Defendant:
George C. McNamee, Gary K. Willis, Maureen O. Helmer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power, Inc.
Bhavsar et al. v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv09452
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Andrew Marsh, Paul B. Middleton, David Mindnich and others
Nominal Defendant:
Plug Power Inc.
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv14132
Plaintiff:
Maureen Magnifico and Pete Buttigieg, Secretary, of Uited States Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Unknown v Unknown
as 1:2023cv14134
Plaintiff:
Maureen Magnifico and Unknown
Counter Defendant:
Pete Buttigieg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Macher v. Price-Boreland et al
as 3:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Vorcelia Oliphant Macher
Defendant:
Maureen Price-Boreland and Peter J. Macher
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
