Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55359
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojocicki, et al
as 19-20191
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, PATRICIA HENRICKS, TOYIN FASAKIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Scott Van Horn et al v. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01236
Defendant:
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Harvey and Scott Van Horn
Danny Harvey v. USDC-AK
as 14-70765
:
In re: DANNY MICHAEL HARVEY
Petitioner:
DANNY MICHAEL HARVEY, AKA dad4dghtr, AKA Mike, AKA Sgt_Dad
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
New Times, Inc., et al v. Suthers
as 1:2000cv00612
Plaintiff:
New Times, Inc. , Association of Alternative Newsweeklies , Dark Night Press and others
Defendant:
John Suthers
Interested_party:
Jacob Ind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Harvey v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv06779
Plaintiff:
Michael Harvey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Danny Harvey
as 09-30213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANNY MICHAEL HARVEY, AKA Mike, AKA dad4dghtr, AKA Sgt_Dad
Hirz et al v. Travelcomm Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01833
Plaintiff:
Donald Hirz, Mary Lou Ambrose, Jennifer Baxter and others
Defendant:
Travelcomm Industries, Inc., RIGOBERTO Sotolongo and PETER Sotolongo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
