Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02225
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Mitsui & Co. (Usa) Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Office Depot, Inc. v. TECHNICOLOR SA et al
as 3:2013cv05726
Plaintiff:
Office Depot Inc.
Defendant:
Technicolor S.A, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
State of California et al v. Office Depot Inc
as 2:2012cv09952
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Baldwin Park Unified School District, City of Azusa, City of Colton and others
Intervenor:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Office Depot Inc
Plaintiff:
David Sherwin and State of California
Office Depot, Inc. v. Zuccarini
as 3:2006mc80356
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Receiver:
Michael Blacksburg
Intervenor:
Network Solutions, LLC and United States of America
Defendant:
John Zuccarini doing business as Country Walk
Not Classified By Court:
DS Holdings, LLC
Carroll v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv03204
Plaintiff:
Julian Carroll
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv06276
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd, Hitachi America, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Anderson v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02212
Petitioner:
Sylvia Anderson
Respondent:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 4:2011cv01589
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Anderson
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Akel v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
Eyad O Akel
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Impey v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01973
Plaintiff:
Daniel Impey
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
