Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Confederated Tribes, et al v. Steven Mnuchin
as 20-5205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 20-cv-01059, Nondalton Tribal Council, 20-cv-01059, Rosebud Sioux Tribe, 20-cv-01059 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pueblo of Picuris, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Tulalip Tribes and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Napaskiak, Incorporated, St. Mary's Native Corporation, Sea Lion Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Steven T. Mnuchin, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of the Treasury
Amicus Curiae:
California Tribal Chairperson's Association, California Nations Indian Gaming Association, Alaska Federation of Natives and others
Petitioner:
Cook Inlet Region, Inc.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae:
State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Dakota Access LLC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04010
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Inclusive, Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Oglala Sioux Tribe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01059
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Plaintiff:
ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE, CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01002
Plaintiff:
TULALIP TRIBES, HOULTON BAND OF MALISEET INDIANS, AKIAK NATIVE COMMUNITY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Intervenor Defendant:
NAPASKIAK, INCORPORATED, ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATION ASSOCIATION, INC., CALISTA CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIVE AMERICAN FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
In Re: $323,647.60 in Funds Belonging to the California Valley Miwok Tribe
as 1:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter, Pueblo of Zuni and Oglala Sioux Tribe
In Re:
$323,647.60 in Funds Belonging to the California Valley Miwok Tribe
Interpleader:
California Valley Miwok Tribe, Velma White Bear, Gilbert Ramirez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. NRC, et al
as 17-1059
Petitioner:
Oglala Sioux Tribe
Respondent:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Powertech (USA), Inc.
OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 1:2017cv00267
Plaintiff:
OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Sprint Communications Company, et al v. Mary Wynne, et al
as 15-2954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Communications, Inc., formerly known as Sprint Nextel Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Wynne, in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Court, Oglala Sioux Tribe Utilities Commission, Joe Red Cloud and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
