Cases 11 - 20 of 114
Huynh v. Rettig et al
as 2:2020cv00306
Plaintiff:
Daniel M Huynh
Defendant:
Paul Harper, Charles P Rettig and Kelly Irving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Russell v. University of Arizona et al
as 4:2020cv00028
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Russell
Defendant:
Kevin F Moynahan, Sean P Elliott, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Boigris v. EWC P&T LLC
as 2:2019mc00041
Petitioner:
EWC P&T LLC
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Boigris
Falcone v. Dingess et al
as 2:2019cv04547
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Falcone
Zhu et al v. Taronis Technologies Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04529
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hatten and Kui Zhu
Petitioner:
Armando Martin Campos and Vardan Petrosyan
Graves v. Bernhardt et al
as 2:2019cv02463
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, Sonny Perdue, Brian Steed and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndon P Graves, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Equality Arizona et al v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Calvin Baker, Janice Mak, Armando Ruiz and others
Plaintiff:
Equality Arizona and Carol Brochin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruno v. Abeyta
as 2:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
P Leonard Bruno
Defendant:
Gary Paul Abeyta
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Defendant:
Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated, J Douglas Sanders, Amin N Maredia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bruno v. Sherman & Howard LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
P Leonard Bruno
Defendant:
Sherman & Howard LLC , Schoenberg Family Law Group PLC , Professional Beauty Association and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
