Cases 11 - 20 of 168
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16684
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMITTED REPEALER STATE INDIRECT-PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Proposed Intervenors
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16685
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16686
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
DAVID N. WATSON, JESSICA M. MCINTYRE, ERIC R. COGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16081
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF BARBARA CALDWELL, ANTHONY GIANASCA, CAROLYN JORGENSEN and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant:
IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06901
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Shenzhen Seg Hitachi Color Display Devices, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Jimmy Jahar Thule, Ramzi Yusef and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hicksville Water District v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv04442
Defendant:
FED LI LLC, GSM LI LLC, ICA LI LCC and others
Plaintiff:
Hicksville Water District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
