Cases 11 - 20 of 564
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States of America v. Muria-Palacios
as 24-2578
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUAN ALBERTO MURIA-PALACIOS
Aaron Flores Palacios v. Precision Anodizing and Plating, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Flores Palacios
Defendant:
Precision Anodizing & Plating, Inc. and Precision Anodizing and Plating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Piaggio v. Puga
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Aldo Enrique Fausto Francsiscolo Piaggio
Defendant:
Claudia Maria Palacios Puga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act
USA v. Jamar Nattiel, et al
as 24-10954
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMAR BRANDON NATTIEL, PALACIO FARLEY and JOASSAINT JOSIAH ARISTIL
USA v. Palacios-De Paz
as 24-50212
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Palacios-De Paz, also known as Luis Antonio Roman, also known as Bulmaro Palacios-De Paz, also known as Raul Palacios
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Ochoa Contreras, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1407
Petitioner:
JAMES PAUL OCHOA CONTRERAS, VICTORIA FLORES PALACIOS and JAMIE JAMES OCHOA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Valladares-Maldonado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-972
Petitioner:
IVAN OSWALDO VALLADARES-MALDONADO, GRISELDA MENDEZ-PALACIOS, JOSE IVAN VALLADARES-MENDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
