Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Deyoe Harris v. State of Arizona
as 22-15318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEYOE R. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
RUBIN v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUBIN
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
WOLFSON v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WOLFSON
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L. BONVENUTO, JAMES J. DOLAN and others
v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L. BONVENUTO, JAMES J. DOLAN and others
BUSHANSKY v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
Stein v. TriState Capital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
TriState Capital Holdings, Inc., David L. Bonvenuto, Anthony J. Buzzelli and others
Warren Harris v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 21-7122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Warren R. Harris
Defendant / Appellee:
Muriel Bowser, in her official capacity as the Mayor of the District of Columbia, Barbara J. Bazron, in her official capacity as the Director of the D.C. Department of Behavioral Health, Mark J. Chastang, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer of St. Elizabeths Hospital and others
Harris v. Arizona, State of
as 4:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Deyoe R Harris
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
In Re: Daniel Miller
as 21-1826
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Respondent:
David R. Harris, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Thomas A. Coughlin, III, Henry S. Dogin, Administrator Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice and others
Deyoe Harris v. State of Arizona
as 21-16218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEYOE R. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
