Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Reneau v. Cardinas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1220
Defendant / Appellee: DOCTOR LOUIS CABILING, in his individual capacity, MARY CARDINAS, in her individual capacity, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHESTER LEE RENEAU
Bertolo v. Raemisch, et al
as 20-1154
Defendant / Appellee: LAURA SHAIN, MATHEW HANSON, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES M. BERTOLO
Kilman v. Williams, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant: TOBI KILMAN
Defendant / Appellee: JOE ORTIZ, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., ARISTEDES ZAVARES, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., FRANK GUNTER, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C. and others
Baars v. Raemisch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1451
Defendant / Appellee: RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of Colorado Department of Corrections and MARY CARLSON, Head of Time/Release Operation for the Colorado Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROGER DALE BAARS, JR.
In re: Dawson
as 19-1412
Respondent: C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections, D. HIBBS and others
Petitioner: JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
In re: Estes
as 19-1312
Respondent: M. D. CARVAJAL, RICK RAEMISCH, CYNTHIA COFFMAN and others
Petitioner: JONATHAN N. ESTES
Mason, et al v. Raemisch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1273
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEROY W. BAKER, SPENCER BREWER, TERRY PHILLIPS and others
Defendant / Appellee: (FNU) QUINLAN, in his individual capacity, DAVID SCHERBARTH, in his individual capacity, RICK RAEMISCH, in his official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?