Cases 11 - 20 of 189
United States of America v. Chambers (Kidd)
as 23-6400
Defendant:
MARCUS CHAMBERS, Chino, Chi D and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DARNELL KIDD, Black, Donney and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SPS I Fundo de Investimento de Acoes-Investimento
as 22-3200
Petitioner:
SPS I Fundo de Investimento de Acoes-Investimento no Exterior
Intervenor:
Joesley Batista, JBS S.A., J&F Investimentos S.A. and others
Three Bell Capital Document Subpoena
as 5:2022mc80338
Plaintiff:
Three Bell Capital
Defendant:
HASelect-Medical Receivables Litigation Finance Fund International SP
United States of America v. Chambers
as 22-3165
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darnell Kidd, AKA Black, AKA Donney, AKA Donney Black
Defendant / Appellant:
Marcus Chambers, AKA Chino, AKA Chi D, AKA SP
In re: Application of SPS Corp I
as 22-3331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SPS CORP I, Fundo de Investimento em Direitos Creditorios Nao Padronizados
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS CO, DELOITTE & TOUCHE and ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-8063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kahl v. Superior Vanlines Inc LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kahl
Defendant:
Superior Vanlines Inc LLC and Moving Services SP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-8050
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
