Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Bixler v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2021cv00841
Defendant: Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and Commissioner of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency
Plaintiff: Dr. Amy Bixler and Glenn Osowski
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. ยง 0557
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-319
Respondent / Appellee: Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Franklin Lopez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-1259
Defendant / Appellee: Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Jean King, Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Samuel Martinez Lopez, all others similarly situated and Franklin Lopez, all others similarly situated
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner: Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Las Americas Immigrant Advoca, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 20-5386
Plaintiff / Appellant: K.M.V., and their minor child F.B.G.C., B.G.R., and her minor children, D.M.F.G., B.C.F.G., J.M.F.G., and S.F.G., L.E.R.D., minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee: Gloria Chavez, in her official capacity, Border Patrol Sector Chief, El Paso, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Francisco Munoz Ortiz v. William Barr, et al
as 20-36050
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN LANGFORD, Warden, Tacoma Northwest Detention Center, NATHALIE ASHER, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office Director (Tacoma ICE) and others
Petitioner: FRANCISCO MUNOZ ORTIZ
Simon Ortiz Vargas v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-17223
Petitioner: SIMON ORTIZ VARGAS
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity, San Francisco Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Jason Nsinano v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56162
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant: JASON SINAGWANA NSINANO
Kusuma Nio, et al v. DHS, et al
as 20-5326
Defendant / Appellee: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Defense and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jae Seong Park, Seung Joo Hong, Haendel Crist Calisto Alves De Almeida and others
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Barr
as 20-3712
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Defendant: Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office For Immigration Review, James McHenry, in his official capacity as the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?