Cases 11 - 20 of 842
B.K., et al. v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District, et al.
as 24-3531
Plaintiff:
B.K., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, and parent, Aydin Kocataskin and AYDIN KOCATASKIN, as guardian ad litem, and parent for minor, B.K.
Defendant:
SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL BOARD, COLEEN DAVENPORT and others
SHELTON v. JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHELTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Shelton
as 24-6100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RODNEY JOE SHELTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Slack v. Jinkens, et al.
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE SLACK
Defendant:
W. JINKENS, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, JENNIFER LNU, Chaplain at Benton County Correction, COMBS, Lieutenant at Benton County Correction and others
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 24-1049
Plaintiff:
DUANE SMITH, as Administrator of the Estate of Barbara Shelton, deceased
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT
Not Yet Classified:
ROOF DIAGNOSTICS SOLAR & ELECTRIC LLC and NRG ENERGY, INC.
Clark v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Coffman v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Shelton v. Priority Concepts Inc.
as 2:2024cv02581
Plaintiff:
James E. Shelton
Defendant:
Priority Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
