Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Hallmark Specialty Insurance C v. The Continental Insurance Comp, et al
as 20-17314
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation and NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, an Illinois corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation
MSP Recovery Claims Series LLC et al v. National Continental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv24136
Plaintiff:
MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, Series PMPI, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and MSP Recovery Claims Series LLC
Defendant:
Progressive American Insurance Company, Progressive Express Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
The Continental Insurance Co. v. Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
as 20-1689
Plaintiff / Appellee:
The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellant:
Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
The Continental Insurance Co. v. Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
as 20-1131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellant:
Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
SCF Waxler Marine, L.L.C., et al v. Aris T M/V, et al
as 20-30019
Claimant:
KIRBY INLAND MARINE, L.P.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MOTIVA ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. and VALERO REFINING - NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTOINE MORRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARMARAS NAVIGATION LIMITED
Cross Appellant:
ARIS T M/V
3Rd Party Defendant:
NATIONAL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ARIS T. ENE, GENESIS MARINE, L.L.C., owners and operators of the M/V ELIZABETH ROBINSON and her tow and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCF WAXLER MARINE, L.L.C., doing business as SCF Liquids
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELL CHEMICAL, L.P.
California Department of Toxic, et al v. Century Indemnity Company, et al
as 20-15029
Defendant:
DAVID VAN OVER, individually, PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING, a dissolved California corporation, WEST COAST WOOD PRESERVING, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACCOUNT and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
Santos-Arrieta, et al v. Hospital Del Maestro, Inc., et al
as 19-1935
Defendant / Appellee:
HOSPITAL DEL MAESTRO, or alternatively, John Doe Corporation, d/b/a Hospital Del Maestro and CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
G.Q.S., minor represented by their parents Damaris Santos-Arrieta and Gustavo Querales-Salcedo, DAMARIS SANTOS-ARRIETA, and Gustavo Querales Salcedo, in representation of their minor son GQS, GUSTAVO QUERALES-SALCEDO, and Damaris Santos Arrieta, in representation of their minor son GQS and others
Defendant:
PUERTO RICO MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE CO., FELIX VILLAR-ROBLES, and his wife Jane Doe, in representation of their conjugal partnership, JANE DOE, and her husband Felix Villar Robles, in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
The Continental Insurance Co. v. Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
as 19-2993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellant:
Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
In Re: Santos-Arrieta, et al
as 19-1837
Respondent:
PUERTO RICO MEDICAL DEFENSE INSURANCE CO., CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HOSPITAL DE MAESTRO, INC., or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Del Maestro and others
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO QUERALES-SALCEDO, and Damaris Santos Arrieta, in representation of their minor son G.Q.S, G.Q.S., minor represented by their parents Damaris Santos-Arrieta and Gustavo Querales-Salcedo and DAMARIS SANTOS-ARRIETA, and Gustavo Querales Salcedo, in representation of their minor son G.Q.S.
National Continental Ins v. Nurbek Aiazbekov, et al
as 19-1926
Defendant:
ROAD CARRIERS, INC. and NURBEK AIAZBEKOV
Defendant / Appellant:
ZEF LJAJCAJ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATIONAL CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
