Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2632
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2625
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2607
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr. v. Millersville University of Pen, et al
as 21-8039
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ET AL., ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2379
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Jeffrey Gibson v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-1062
Defendant:
UPMC PINNACLE HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
UPMC v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv02781
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff:
UPMC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
UPMC v. AZAR et al
as 2:2020cv01276
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
UPMC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
DOE I, ET AL v. UPMC
as 2:2020cv00359
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE I and JANE DOE II
Defendant:
UPMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Donna Katz v. UPMC, et al
as 19-3938
Defendant / Appellee:
UPMC HOLDING CO INC, UPMC, STACEY A. COTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA KATZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
