Cases 11 - 20 of 324
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Trejos Hermanos Sucesores S.A. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 24-305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TREJOS HERMANOS SUCESORES S.A.
Defendant / Appellant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 24-531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 24-306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DEPALMA v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., et al
as 2:2023cv22318
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DEPALMA
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.,, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (FICTIOUS NAMES DESCRIBING PRESENTLY UNIDENTIFIED BUSINESS ENTITIES) and JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES, TRUE NAMES PRESENTLY UNKNOWN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
SARVER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
WADE SARVER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
