Cases 11 - 20 of 334
Info-Gel, LLC v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Info-Gel, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Williams
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
United States of America v. Oak-Bark Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oak-Bark Corporation, Cronly Bluffs, LLC, William E Oakley and others
Trustee:
Eleanor W Lindemann and Elizabeth W McMillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Woolens v. Ruckle
as 7:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
William D. Woolens
Defendant:
Charlene Denise Ruckle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WATSON-DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JANELLE NICOLE WATSON-DAVIS
Defendant:
JASON WILLIAMS and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
State of North Carolina, Onslow County Court et al v. Davis
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, Onslow County Court, K. Shotwell, Judges and others
Defendant:
William Hercules Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Randall et al v. Metzger
as 1:2023cv00043
Defendant:
K. D. Bryson, William Randall, Kevin David Bryson and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Woolens v. Ruckle et al
as 7:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
William D. Woolens
Defendant:
Charlene Denise Ruckle, Wanda Moore and Jill Switzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
