Cases 21 - 30 of 2,761
Murphy v. Onondaga County
as 24-904
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MURPHY
Defendant:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, ONONDAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARL HUMMEL, all individually and in their capacities as employees of Onondaga County and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Benjamin Locke v. North Carolina State University
as 24-148
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN C. LOCKE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY and ROBERT M. MURPHY, JR., in his official and individual capacities
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
DiPierro v. New York State Unified Court System
as 24-571
Plaintiff:
PAUL DIPIERRO and MARIE ZWEIG
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, NEW YORK OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, JUSTIN BARRY and others
SHEIKHBAHAEI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
ALI MATTHEW SHEIKHBAHAEI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN ABU DHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ANTONY BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd, Douyin Ltd., TikTok Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo, Katie Murphy, Artemis Buckley and others
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Traylor v. Pacciuco LLC
as 24-691
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER TRAYLOR
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERFORD, LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD LANGHAMMER, LLC, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
