Cases 21 - 30 of 2,904
Ortiz Garabito v. Garland
as 24-2611
Petitioner:
ROSA LINDA ORTIZ GARABITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz-Mendoza v. Garland
as 24-1095
Petitioner:
ARELI YESSANIA ORTIZ-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodas-Zacarias, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2480
Petitioner:
ERICK ANDULIO RODAS-ZACARIAS, NIDIAN ESTRELLA ORTIZ-ORTIZ and ALISSON ELIZABETH GISSEL RODAS-ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Avila-Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-60175
Petitioner:
Francisca Marisela Avila-Ortiz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Alvarez v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Adriana Mancera Alvarez
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Illescas Ortiz v. Garland
as 24-799
Petitioner:
CARMEN EUGENIA ILLESCAS ORTIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
USA v. Ortiz-Rodriguez
as 24-50224
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ismael Adan Ortiz-Rodriguez
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
