Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Reporters Committee for Freed, et al v. FBI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5091
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff / Appellant: Associated Press and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner: MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae: TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor: JURORS
KUPPERMAN v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03224
Plaintiff: CHARLES M KUPPERMAN and CHARLES M. KUPPERMAN
Defendant: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A., CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NANCY PELOSI and others
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC, et al
as 1:2019mc00174
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC,
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES CO, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL T. FLYNN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00029
In Re: APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC
Petitioner: NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Respondent: ROGER STONE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant: BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae: MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
NVLSP v. US
as 19-1081
Amicus Curiae: CALIFORNIA NEWS PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, RADIO TELEVISION DIGITAL NEWS ASSOCIATION, JUDICATA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE and NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER
Defendant / Cross Appellant: UNITED STATES
In re: In the Matter of the App
as 18-5276
Amicus Curiae: Lyrissa Lidsky, The McClatchy Company, Tully Center for Free Speech and others
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
In Re: In re: In the Matter of the Application of Jason Leopold to Unseal Certain Electronic Surveillance Applications and Orders
Not Yet Classified: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Petitioner / Appellant: Jason Leopold
In re: Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 18-1762
Petitioner: THE NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE, SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, THE MEDIA LAW RESOURCE CENTER, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?