Cases 21 - 30 of 2,212
State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey v. Biden et al
as 4:2024cv01063
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, Janet Yellen, Adrianne Todman and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Missouri ex rel Bailey v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Unknown:
Andrew Bailey
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Darrel L. Bailey v. Martha M. Pacold
as 24-2229
Petitioner:
DARREL L. BAILEY
Respondent:
MARTHA M. PACOLD
BAILEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03311
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BENITA BAILEY
BAILEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03257
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
ERIKA BAILEY
BAILEY v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
RYAN A BAILEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bailey v. National Security Agency, et al.
as 24-4396
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, through Joseph R. Biden, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, through Lloyd J. Austin, III and others
Petitioner:
EARLEAN BAILEY
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Boria
as 24-1871
Defendant:
Jewelry, MAURICE STEELE, PHILIP RICHARDS and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Republic of Nicaragua v. The Lopez-Goyne Family et al
as 3:2024cv03104
Respondent:
MR. HAROLD ORRIS SHATTUCK, MR. JAMES DOUGLAS GOYNE, MS EMILY LOPEZ GOYNE and others
Petitioner:
THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
