Cases 21 - 30 of 161
U.S. Bank v. Julien
as 8:2016mc00083
Defendant:
William Edward Julien
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Centennial Bank v. Julien
as 8:2016mc00075
Plaintiff:
Centennial Bank
Defendant:
William Edward Julien
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
World's Foremost Bank v. Hemmingson et al
as 4:2016mc03039
Defendant:
Mark D. Hemmingson
Debtor:
Sharon A. Hemmingson
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff:
World's Foremost Bank
World's Foremost Bank v. Wilen
as 4:2016mc03033
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Defendant:
Rick A. Wilen
Plaintiff:
World's Foremost Bank
First National Bank of Omaha v. Le
as 4:2016mc03022
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Defendant:
Andy An Le
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
First National Bank of Omaha v. Wilke et al
as 8:2016mc00034
Plaintiff:
First National Bank of Omaha
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Defendant:
Ann Marie Wilke
Debtor:
Robert Wilke
Saldi et al v. American National Bank et al
as 8:2016cv00061
Defendant:
American National Bank, Rodney L. Laible, RD Family Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Saldi, Debra Saldi and TBD Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lundahl et al v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2016cv03000
Defendant:
Does 1-10 Inc., Glenna Gottfredson, Kristi Gould and others
303) 212-6888 (fax:
Holli Lundahl
307) 212-6888 (fax:
Logan Lundahl
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lundahl et al v. Dunn et al
as 4:2015cv03133
Defendant:
B J Brown, Craig Christensen, Lon Colton and others
307) 212-6888 (fax:
Logan Lundahl and Holli Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
