Cases 21 - 30 of 227
Martha Smith, et al v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 19-1051
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martha G. Smith and George S. Lakner
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Martha Smith, et al v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 19-1052
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martha G. Smith and George S. Lakner
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
William Scott v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 19-1022
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Mark Scott
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Roy Meidinger v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 19-1021
Petitioner / Appellant:
Roy J. Meidinger
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service and Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Douglas Wickey v. Commissioner of IRS, et al
as 19-10113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS OLIVER WICKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Satterlee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2018cv03348
Defendant:
Disclosure Officer, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Satterlee
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6111
Satterlee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2018cv03337
Defendant:
Freedom of Information Request, US Department of the Treasury, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Satterlee
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6111
Aycock et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2018cv02463
Petitioner:
Linda J. Aycock and Calvin D. Aycock
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dreck Wilson v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 17-1225
Petitioner - Appellant:
Dreck Spurlock Wilson
Respondent - Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Gerd Topsnik v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 17-1211
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gerd Topsnik
Respondent - Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
