Cases 21 - 30 of 725
USA v. Andrew Johnson
as 23-2079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW DREW JOHNSON
United States of America v. Rankin
as 23-7882
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SULLIVAN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DREW RANKIN
United States of America v. Rankin (Sullivan)
as 23-7887
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES SULLIVAN
United States of America v. Rankin (Bilda)
as 23-7875
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DREW RANKIN, JAMES SULLIVAN, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BILDA
Anthony WilliamsIn re: Anthony Williams
as 23-3037
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KYLE RUSSELL, DEPUTY STEVEN MILLER, Warden of Treatment, DEPUTY ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Hardman v. Birkholz
as 23-3664
Petitioner / Appellant:
PARLEY DREW HARDMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden
USA v. Ramel Drew
as 23-3932
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMEL DREW
USA v. Ramel Drew
as 23-3931
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMEL DREW
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Drew v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Courtney S Drew
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
