Cases 21 - 30 of 167
Escamilla v. Elliott
as 21-50931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rachel Escamilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela Elliott and Edwards County, Texas
US v. Gilberto Escamilla
as 21-4513
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GILBERTO ESPINAL ESCAMILLA
Odgers Berndtson, LLC v. O'Neil et al
as 1:2021cv05652
Plaintiff:
Odgers Berndtson, LLC
Defendant:
Javier O'Neil and Valeria Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Escamilla Vidals v. Garland
as 21-6316
Petitioner:
MARCELO ESCAMILLA VIDALS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Medrano
as 21-20254
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Escamilla Medrano
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Gustavo Escamilla, et al v. USA
as 21-55417
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREENWAY NUTRIENTS, INC. and GUSTAVO ESCAMILLA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlos Escamilla v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 21-55398
Respondent / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California and RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS CORTEZ ESCAMILLA
Gustavo Escamilla, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 21-70939
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
GREENWAY NUTRIENTS, INC. and GUSTAVO ESCAMILLA
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and In re: GUSTAVO ESCAMILLA
Randell Turner v. Adalberto Alberto, et al
as 21-15386
Defendant / Appellee:
SILVA, Officer, CITY OF UNION CITY, SHANSAB, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDELL LOWELL JAMES TURNER
Randell Turner v. Adalberto Alberto, et al
as 21-15183
Defendant / Appellee:
SILVA, Officer, CITY OF UNION CITY, SHANSAB, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDELL LOWELL JAMES TURNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
