Cases 21 - 30 of 40
In re: Michael Wright
as 14-13497
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. WRIGHT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright v. Caswell Overlook Community Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01147
Plaintiff:
William J. Wright
Defendant:
Caswell Overlook Community Association, Inc., Lueder, Larkin & Hunter, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
RONALD J. WRIGHT, JR. and CAPITOL HILL PREMIUM CIGARS AND TOBACCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Theft of Satellite Communications Services
Linebarger Googan Blair & Samp
as 12-511
Petitioner:
LINEBARGER GOOGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP, a Texas limited liability partnership
Respondent:
BRENDA J. WRIGHT YOUNGBLOOD
United States v. Joseph Wright
as 11-2863
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph J. Wright
GAY v. RUMSON CAPITAL, LP et al
as 2:2010cv06997
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GAY
Defendant:
RUMSON CAPITAL, LP , THE RUMSON GROUP, LLC , SAM MANGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bach v. Idaho State Board of Medicine et al
as 4:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
John N. Bach and Cindy Lee Bach
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Medicine, Steve J. Wright, Wright, John, Tolson, and Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bach v. Idaho State Board of Medicine et al
as 1:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
John N. Bach and Cindy Lee Bach
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Medicine, Steve J. Wright, Wright, John, Tolson, and Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
In re: Robert Heptinstall, et al
as 10-13042
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT H. HEPTINSTALL, WENDELL E. SIMS, JAMES L. COLLINS and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
