Cases 21 - 30 of 452
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Smith v. McDonough
as 23-1749
Claimant:
JOSHUA L. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Tabor Store, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Tabor Store, LLC d/b/a The Tabor Store, Jayme E. Smith, Alan L. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Danny Smith
as 22-12236
Petitioner:
In re: DANNY L. SMITH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
RUBEN V. FLORES, DELIA D. FLORES, JOSHUA D. FLORES and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03693
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Robert F. Apple, Leonard S. Jacob and others
Wilson v. Antares Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Antares Pharma, Inc., Leonard S. Jacob, Thomas J. Garrity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
