Cases 21 - 30 of 542
Finlayson v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07150
Plaintiff:
Ian Finlayson
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
O'Dell v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06825
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
Baker v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07289
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
Justice v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07234
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
Bushansky v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04978
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Paul R. Auvil, Mark S. Blumenkranz and others
Jenkins v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
KARNDEAN INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. ROBBINS et al
as 2:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
KARNDEAN INTERNATIONAL, LLC doing business as KARNDEAN DESIGNFLOORING
Defendant:
MARK S. ROBBINS and HAPPY FEET INTERNATIONAL LLC
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 22-2445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PACE O MATIC INC
Defendant / Appellee:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Appellant:
HAWKE MCKEON & SNISCAK LLP
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 22-2446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PACE O MATIC INC
Defendant / Appellee:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Appellant:
GREENWOOD GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT INC
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 22-8038
Respondent:
PACE O MATIC INC
Petitioner:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
