Cases 21 - 30 of 3,194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Anthony Marshall
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Byron Marshall
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lettieri v. United States Marshals Service
as 24-628
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
USA v. Benjamin Marshall
as 24-3192
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BENJAMIN DALE MARSHALL
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
